WTC Nuclear Demolition

	Duration: 10:52 minutes Upload Time: 2007-04-25 23:49:39 User: mysticalgroove :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: This video takes a brief look in to the theory of explosive nuclear devices and their usage at the World Trade Center in New York. on 'September 11th'
Comments
myster1234 ::: Favorites absolutely, people today have forgotten the sheer devastation even the smallest nuke can inflict. They see this and think it's a nuke. That is sad. There was video of the Iraq GulfWar II "shock and awe" attack, and some explosions had large clouds. People thought those were nukes. Retards. Every single one of them. Want to see nuke blast? Watch the tons of NUCLEAR BLAST videos on YouTube. 07-10-17 00:38:57 __________________________________________________
hkkorly ::: Favorites Like Karosine could weaken steel to the point of failure in less than 2 hours. Those buildings could withstand 707s crashing into them, this was reported BEFORE 9/11 by the WTC construction manager. Hell, he said it was designed to take multiple crashes. These buildings were incredibly well-built. Planes are simply not that powerful. 07-10-11 20:52:10 __________________________________________________
ZachScape ::: Favorites The smallest nuclear bomb that could be created, with todays technology, is 1 MT. Tihs would instantly destroy more than four blocks, yet not having a high level of radiation. The reason people got sick was because of the dust in the air. Like the video said, 99 percent of the building was turned to a fine dust. I definitely agree that their were bombs, and that the plume looked like a nuke, but many many many bombs have plumes. I may be a complete idiot, but I disagree with the nuke theory. 07-10-10 19:36:19 __________________________________________________
TungstenOrWolfram ::: Favorites There were no airliners. Accept the truth. 07-09-24 18:47:49 __________________________________________________
hipchek ::: Favorites i accept that you believe that but you have no proof neither does anyone else. you and rosie o'donnel must hang out alot,huh? so i guess you believe steel doesnt melt either. it only needed to be weakend not completely melted to fail. 07-09-24 18:28:46 __________________________________________________
mightypen2007 ::: Favorites Wrong. Explosives + thermite destroyed those buildings turning concrete into dust, and melting metal beams. The fuel from the airliners couldn't cause that level of "structural failure". It's like trying to melt a spoon with a lighter. Accept the truth. 07-09-24 15:55:12 __________________________________________________
hipchek ::: Favorites oh please!! you guys are off your rocker! commercial airliners full of fuel hitting building 2/3 the way up destroying massive amounts of SUPPORT structure= structural failure duhh 07-09-24 14:45:21 __________________________________________________
Aanthanur ::: Favorites mmmhhh mini nukes :/ 07-09-24 01:37:06 __________________________________________________
antasaur ::: Favorites thier was no freaking planes you morons. the media used coputer grafics to cover up that missles hit the towers and the other places. watch september clues and type in fake airplaines or fake t.v. footage 07-09-23 13:16:58 __________________________________________________
mysticalgroove ::: Favorites yes apparently lots of people got sick and died working on the pile at ground zero, not just people but the rescue dogs too. People are still suffering today. Watch nuclear demolition 2 for more info. 07-09-22 13:09:04 __________________________________________________