 |
Duration: 03:26 minutes Upload Time: 2007-12-27 06:24:41 User: HighFlyingDutchman :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Tags:
evolution charles darwin fish human ape transitional form fairy tale science dawkins delusion creation parody funny animation blooper improv pranks video blog stand-up spoof sketch short film series aviation space computer diy electronics environment gadget game mechanics aquatic bird cat dog hamster insect rabbit reptile wildlife
Description: !READ IT ALL CAREFULLY PLEASE! Let's get a lil' serious. Why Transition From Water to Land is Impossible Evolutionists claim that one day, a species dwelling in water somehow stepped onto land and was transformed into a land-dwelling species. There are a number of obvious facts that render such a transition impossible: 1. Weight-bearing: Sea-dwelling creatures have no problem in bearing their own weight in the sea. However, most land-dwelling creatures consume 40% of their energy just in carrying their bodies around. Creatures making the transition from water to land would at the same time have had to develop new muscular and skeletal systems (!) to meet this energy need, and this could not have come about by chance mutations. 2. Heat Retention: On land, the temperature can change quickly, and fluctuates over a wide range. Land-dwelling creatures possess a physical mechanism that can withstand such great temperature changes. However, in the sea, the temperature changes slowly and within a narrower range. A living organism with a body system regulated according to the constant temperature of the sea would need to acquire a protective system to ensure minimum harm from the temperature changes on land. It is preposterous to claim that fish acquired such a system by random mutations as soon as they stepped onto land. 3. Water: Essential to metabolism, water needs to be used economically due to its relative scarcity on land. For instance,, the skin has to be able to permit a certain amount of water loss, while also preventing excessive evaporation. That is why land-dwelling creatures experience thirst, something the land-dwelling creatures do not do. For this reason, the skin of sea-dwelling animals is not suitable for a nonaquatic habitat. 4. Kidneys: Sea-dwelling organisms discharge waste materials, especially ammonia, by means of their aquatic environment. On land, water has to be used economically. This is why these living beings have a kidney system. Thanks to the kidneys, ammonia is stored by being converted into urea and the minimum amount of water is used during its excretion. In addition, new systems are needed to provide the kidney's functioning. In short, in order for the passage from water to land to have occurred, living things without a kidney would have had to develop a kidney system all at once. 5. Respiratory system: Fish "breathe" by taking in oxygen dissolved in water that they pass through their gills. They canot live more than a few minutes out of water. In order to survive on land, they would have to acquire a perfect lung system all of a sudden. It is most certainly impossible that all these dramatic physiological changes could have happened in the same organism at the same time, and all by chance. But of course,there is not a law that forbids you to imagine. Also you are free to believe in fairy tales,although they may be defended by serious and educated people. **** The video was made by this user: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Prophetes Special thanks. For more evolution tales,please visit this website: http://www.evolutiontale.com Peace to everybody. |
|
Comments | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 06:43:52 so tell me eistein where they go to breed as fish do? those mud skippers havnt evolved reall far in all these millions of years [now have they] how come thier next evolved step died out [they all drowned in the flood?] what walking cat fish evolve into einstoner ?] __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 06:40:53 look at your own fossil fragments dude its not for me to prove they wernt attatched it [that is up to you] i dont claim they evolved at att [attatched or detatched retard you get it your the one saying they did evolve [thus u are saying they are attatched to related species[in a linial , related 'evilutionary' progression]i dont its your straww man dude thats your field not mine __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 06:03:42 yes hollander and levi did that with pigions so now we got blue bars and chequers but both still pigions the allelies for colours and patterns can be selected by culling the checkers [dominant over ressesive but by the same token a random breeding population retains it allelic mean ,ie natural selections =stasis your 3 line speciation 'event' isnt even named lab means men naturally selecting to prove thier point its not natural naturally __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 05:50:17 wow we got pigment neo colour neoi species? X en -opuss? 4n and 12 n yet all still; one genus this duplications of dna dont seem to evolve a lot now do it/this future [time] jumping frog dude what it changed into a frog you say wow ,you can really 'evolve' frogs into frogs now ,amasing how far in time can it jump 3 feet what could its parents jump 3 feet wow can this thing breed with something ot will breedoing it revert it to its genomic mean? positive? or ressesive __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 05:45:06 ok we got ants now ie queens [generational evolutionary period time [queen to queen]years how come ants all look like ants go figure genomicstasis no i dont know either you are so clever so evolved how you gonna breed your supiriour evolved genes into 6 billion [near7]? evolve your deluded theory bro dont mutate [speciate] __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 05:41:13 a rare even one in how many dude? so how many fossils will have this evolution? wow fruit fly tell me what they 'evcolved out of the billions of fruit flies they been breeding [only fruit flies come on that evolution thing really seems a 'rare' event] nuthin but fruit flies you say no march hares? __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 05:38:28 wow a bs in biology my twenty years breeding plants and pigions is nothing befor bio you ever actually breed anything? you cant even apparently figure out a resesive from a dominant within the genome without me spelling it out 4 u [like to a child] i see your going to try to explain your taught idea of a neo chromosonal lineage now cute cut and paste[put up the full link] __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 05:05:50 "Genome duplication has occurred several times in fish and amphibians. The genus Xenopus provides a particularly striking example of this. The genus contains nearly twenty separate species which are all, except one, polyploid, ranging from tetraploid (4N) to dodecaploid (12N)." (Frog genetics: Xenopus tropicalis jumps into the future, Enrique Amaya, Martin F. Offield, and Robert M. Grainger) __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:51:44 "Conclusion Mainly due to the FSGD [ancient fish-specific genome duplication], teleost fishes apparently have a greater repertoire of pigment synthesis genes than any other vertebrate group. Our results support an important role of the FSGD and other types of duplication in the evolution of pigmentation in fish." (Ingo Braasch, et al., Evolution of pigment synthesis pathways by gene and genome duplication in fish, BMC Evol Biol. 2007; 7: 74) __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:43:04 Centric fission again. "Similarly, Imai et al (1994) have shown the importance of chromosomal fission during the karyotypic evolution of the Myrmecia pilosula species complex of ants." (Evolution of a new chromosomal lineage in a laboratory population of Drosophila through centric fission, M T Tanuja, N B Ramachandra and H A Ranganath, Journal of Biosciences. 1999 Dec.; 24(4): 421-6) __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:23:18 Here's one method. "Herein we report the occurrence of a rare event of centric fission of a metacentric chromosome in a laboratory population of Drosophila, called Cytorace 1. This centric fission has been fixed in a sub-population of Cytorace 1, resulting in a new chromosomal lineage called Fissioncytorace-1." Evolution of a new chromosomal lineage in a laboratory population of Drosophila through centric fission, M T Tanuja, N B Ramachandra and H A Ranganath __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:05:10 This is precious. I finished my post by referring to oneundergod as "dummy". He begins his response by saying, "hey dna you are finally seeing the truth"!!!! __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:03:25 "learn genetics before you even try to explain" I have a BS in biology: already took genetics, unlike you. __________________________________________________ | |
| DNAunion ::: Favorites 2008-01-09 04:02:40 what are "ressesive gemones"? __________________________________________________ | |
| oneundergod ::: Favorites 2008-01-08 20:37:15 hey dna you are finally seeing the truth well done now just recant your evolving theory into fact how the genomic quantity of dna become so many chromosonal pairs where they come from dude dont go saying they evolved ,learn genetics before you even try to explain im done responding to your insane rants where your vileness come from ressesive gemones? __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment